What They're Not Telling You
The Constitution, Founding Ideals, and the Role of Hard Work in Earning National Respect
America’s founding documents were written during a time of profound conflict and contradiction. The Constitution was meant to create a more perfect union, yet it emerged from a society that still practiced slavery and denied rights to women, Indigenous people, and immigrants. Nevertheless, these founding texts planted a seed—an aspiration toward justice, equality, and liberty for all—that future generations would strive to fulfill.
When it comes to immigration, the U.S. Constitution does not explicitly guarantee citizenship rights to non-citizens, but it does guarantee certain protections. Through the 5th and 14th Amendments, courts have affirmed that all “persons” within the U.S. are entitled to due process and equal protection under the law[1]. This legal recognition is not just a matter of judicial interpretation—it is a moral echo of the Declaration of Independence’s bold claim that “all men are created equal.”
Still, America has long struggled to practice what it preaches. From the Trail of Tears[2] and the Chinese Exclusion Act[3] to Japanese internment during WWII[4] and modern-day deportations, the U.S. has repeatedly failed to extend its ideals to all who reside within its borders. Legal progress—like Brown v. Board of Education[5], Roe v. Wade[6] (and its recent reversal), and Obergefell v. Hodges[7]—often came only after prolonged public struggle and fierce resistance.
That struggle continues today with immigration. Policies change with each administration, often reflecting political ideologies more than constitutional values. Executive orders can either shield vulnerable people or subject them to sweeping bans, depending on who holds office. This inconsistency undermines public trust and muddles the idea of equal justice under law[8].
Moreover, economic arguments against immigration often ignore reality. Many undocumented workers take on difficult, dangerous jobs that citizens are unwilling to perform. They pay taxes, contribute to local economies, and in many cases, raise families who become integral to their communities[9]. The claim that they are “taking American jobs” collapses under scrutiny—it’s not about jobs, but about who gets to be seen as deserving.
At the heart of this debate is a question of respect. Not just for the Constitution, but for the people who make America what it is. Respect for the rule of law must be balanced with compassion and historical awareness. We cannot demand that people “earn” their place in America without acknowledging that many are already doing so—through labor, community building, and cultural contribution.
Hard work has always been a pillar of American identity. Yet the ideal that anyone can “pull themselves up by their bootstraps” was never universally available. Generations have been excluded from opportunity by design. If we are to honor the Constitution, we must recognize that democracy requires more than elections—it requires engagement, accountability, and the courage to evolve.
This is not a partisan issue. Whether someone supports conservative immigration reform or progressive pathways to citizenship, the conversation must begin with truth: the Constitution belongs to all Americans, but its spirit speaks to all humanity. To defend its integrity is to defend the dignity of those who seek safety, stability, and a chance to contribute.
Progress demands effort. National respect—like individual respect—is not granted by waving flags or repeating slogans. It must be earned through action, compassion, and adherence to the highest ideals of justice. Only then can we claim to be a nation that truly lives up to its founding promise.
References
- Cornell Law School. “Due Process.”
- History.com Editors. “Trail of Tears.”
- ImmigrationHistory.org. “Chinese Exclusion Act (1882).”
- National Archives. “Japanese Relocation During World War II.”
- Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954)
- Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)
- Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015)
- ACLU. “Family Separation by the Trump Administration.” and White House. “Biden Reverses Immigration Orders.”
- Pew Research Center. “Latinos in the Labor Force.”
A Raw Look at Political, Social, and Religious Propaganda
Here's the deal. We're told what they - the owners - want to hear, packaged in nice little soundbites, with just enough truth to make us think we know what's going on. But dig a little deeper, scratch the surface, and you’ll find that the truth isn’t always what they want you to believe. In fact, the things they don’t tell you are often more important than the things they do. And trust me, this goes for politics, social issues, religion, and, yes, even illegal immigration.
Let’s start with the basics. You’re getting fed a constant stream of information from every direction—news outlets, social media, politicians, celebrities, and even your own family and friends. But have you ever stopped to ask yourself, “What’s the agenda behind all of this?” Because, spoiler alert, there’s always an agenda. People are trying to manipulate you, control you, and get you to buy into their way of thinking.
But here’s the kicker: it doesn’t matter if it’s coming from the left, the right, or somewhere in between. It’s all the same game. They feed you half-truths, convenient narratives, and fear-mongering so that you’ll fall in line. They want you to think a certain way, vote a certain way, live a certain way. And if you don’t, well, you’re an outsider. You’re a troublemaker. You’re the problem. But what they’re not telling you is this: the truth is messy, and it's never as simple as their soundbites.
Take illegal immigration, for example. You’ve probably heard all the usual talking points: “They’re stealing our jobs!” “They’re criminals!” “They’re destroying America!” But what they don’t tell you is how the system is broken. The policies are outdated, the system is slow, and the people caught in the middle are the ones getting screwed. The media will push you to hate “the other side,” but what they won’t tell you is how both sides are guilty of playing the game for their own advantage. And while we’re being spoon-fed rhetoric, the real stories—the stories of human suffering, of families risking everything for a better life—get lost in the noise.
I’m not saying there’s a simple solution. Hell no. But here’s what they’re not telling you: the real issue is not about “them vs. us” — it’s about an outdated system that doesn’t reflect the world we live in anymore. It's about big business profiting off cheap labor while the working class gets stuck with the bill. It’s about governments—both U.S. and foreign—throwing the blame around while they keep their hands clean and their pockets full.
Now, let’s talk about your role in all this. The world is built on propaganda. You can see it every time you turn on the news, read a headline, or scroll through your feed. They want you to think a certain way, feel a certain way. They want you to be part of the herd. And when you don’t think for yourself, when you just swallow whatever’s handed to you, you become a cog in the machine. But the thing is—this is your life, not theirs. You have the power to break free from the bullshit, to start asking questions, to think critically about what you’re being told.
So, here’s the question: What do you do when you realize you’ve been played? When you stop drinking the Kool-Aid and start seeing things for what they really are? Well, that’s where things get interesting.
A Parable of a Rally: Thinking for Yourself
Let’s imagine this. You’re at a rally. It’s a hot-button issue: illegal immigration. People on both sides are screaming at each other, spitting out slogans, waving signs, and chanting mindlessly. The energy’s high, and the air is thick with anger and distrust. It’s the typical scene, right? You’ve seen it a thousand times in the media—protestors vs. counter-protestors, a clear divide, no one willing to listen.
But then, something happens. A few voices break through the noise. They aren’t screaming. They aren’t chanting. They’re just talking. Calmly, thoughtfully, with respect. They’re asking questions, encouraging others to think about the issue from all angles. They’re showing that there’s more to the story than what the media’s been telling us. And slowly, very slowly, other people start listening. The anger begins to fade, and the debate shifts from a shouting match to a conversation. People start to realize that maybe, just maybe, they don’t have all the answers. And that’s the turning point.
In the end, the rally isn’t about winning or losing—it’s about people coming together, speaking up in a nonviolent way, and realizing that there’s more to the story than what they’ve been fed. It’s about thinking for yourself, questioning everything, and refusing to buy into the groupthink. Because that’s the real power. That’s the kind of change that lasts.
So, here’s your challenge: Stop swallowing the narrative. Stop being a puppet for the media, the politicians, or whatever group you’re currently aligned with. Take a step back. Look at the world around you with fresh eyes. Ask the hard questions. And then, make your own damn decisions.
Because if you don’t think for yourself, then you’re just another cog in their machine. And you deserve better than that.
This is your world. Start questioning it.
The truth is out there—but it’s up to you to find it. Don’t just settle for the version they give you.
A Critical Look at Power, Politics, and the Struggle for the Soul of a Nation
The intersection of politics and religion has long been a volatile one, and in recent years, the Evangelical movement has become ground zero for a political takeover. Enter Donald J. Trump, a figure who, from a psychological standpoint, has executed one of the most brilliant hijackings of a religious base the country has ever seen. In doing so, he mirrored historical figures like Adolf Hitler, who also used religion and nationalism to manipulate the masses—ultimately leading to the downfall of a nation. However, while Trump may have cunningly positioned himself as a savior for Evangelicals, the very actions that brought him to power are diametrically opposed to the teachings of Christ Himself.
On a psychological level, Trump's success in manipulating Evangelicals is nothing short of genius. He used fear as a tool, painting a picture of a world where Christian values were under attack, promising to be the defender of those values against the "liberal agenda." He preyed on their insecurities and presented himself as their protector, regardless of his own personal flaws or contradictions. It was a classic example of a charismatic leader positioning himself as the solution to a fabricated problem—something we've seen throughout history, including the rise of populist movements.
In many ways, Trump's rise echoes the way Adolf Hitler manipulated the disillusioned masses in Germany, uniting them through a message of nationalism and religious distortion. Hitler knew that religion could be an effective tool in his quest for power, and he skillfully exploited the divisions within the Protestant Church to further his cause. Similarly, Trump exploited the dissatisfaction within Evangelical circles to paint himself as their political champion. However, just as Hitler's use of religion was self-serving, so too was Trump's. His embrace of religious rhetoric was a calculated move designed to gain power, not a true reflection of Christ’s teachings.
When we examine what Jesus might think of this political hijacking, the answer becomes clear: He would not approve. Jesus warned of "wolves in sheep’s clothing" (Matthew 7:15), and Trump’s actions embody this warning. The teachings of Christ are about humility, compassion, and self-sacrifice, none of which align with Trump's self-serving, divisive approach to politics. Trump has positioned himself as a defender of Christianity, but his actions—his lies, his greed, his disregard for truth—are the very antithesis of the values Jesus espoused.
While Trump may have manipulated Evangelicals for political gain, it is important to remember that Jesus would call for true repentance, not political power masked as faith. He would remind us that the Kingdom of God is not a kingdom of earthly dominion, but of justice, humility, and love for all people.
The Liberal Perspective: A View From the Left
From the perspective of liberals, Trump's actions foreshadowed a new era of political threats that undermine the security and values many Americans hold dear. The Evangelical support for Trump, a man who embodies everything contrary to Christian values, served as a catalyst for the erosion of trust in the political system. Liberals saw in Trump the rise of authoritarianism, a figure who used fear, division, and nationalism to rally his supporters, much like the totalitarian regimes of the past.
From a religious standpoint, liberals may find alignment with Jesus' call to care for one’s neighbor, regardless of their criminal past or affiliation. The social justice aspect of liberalism—that of caring for the marginalized, the immigrant, and the oppressed—aligns with Jesus' teachings on love and mercy. However, while liberals may share Christ’s love for the underprivileged, their political actions often diverge from Scripture’s admonitions regarding justice, law, and accountability. The liberal approach, while well-intentioned, sometimes fails to consider the full biblical context and the need for upholding laws and moral integrity in society.
Jesus might call liberals to embrace their compassion but also caution them against policies that undermine the rule of law, the sanctity of life, and the principles of accountability and responsibility. The left’s disregard for moral boundaries can be as dangerous as the right’s willingness to subvert the truth for political gain. Both extremes offer solutions that disregard the balance of justice and grace that Jesus taught.
The Allegory of the Bird With Two Wings: A Native Wisdom Perspective
In Native American culture, there is a powerful allegory of the bird with two wings—one wing representing the spiritual and the other representing the physical. For the bird to fly, both wings must be in harmony, balanced, and working together. This wisdom is a call to unity and balance, a reminder that a society can’t thrive unless it brings together diverse perspectives, whether they are political, social, or religious. The nation cannot move forward if it refuses to balance the moral with the practical, the compassionate with the law.
Unless we as a nation recognize the need for balance—embracing both the wisdom of our founding principles and the compassion of our shared humanity—we will not survive. The next seven generations depend on us finding a path that doesn't bow to political extremes or ideological purity, but rather seeks harmony, truth, and justice. The bird cannot fly with one broken wing, and neither can this nation thrive if it continues to let division rule its heart. We must seek unity, truth, and understanding, or we risk losing everything our ancestors fought for.
Let this serve as a call to break free from the chains of groupthink and seek the truth beyond the narrative. Think for yourself, question the lines drawn for you, and strive to build a nation where justice, truth, and love for all are the true guiding lights.
