Page Banner

Bible Prophecy - Conservative Christianity & The MAGA Cult Part 2

Posted on March 31, 2025 by Minister AJ Wisti
Spirituality Bible Prophecy
An image of Mrs. Tina Wisti, wearing a tiny black dress and laying on some grass.

The Alien Among You: A Biblical Perspective on Justice and Mercy

Throughout history, nations have wrestled with the question of how to treat those who dwell among them as foreigners. In the Bible, God repeatedly commands His people to treat the alien with fairness and compassion, holding them to the same moral and legal standards as the native-born. But how do we balance justice and mercy in a modern world where political lines blur the ethical responsibility given to us by God?

One of the most direct biblical instructions regarding foreigners is found in Leviticus 19:33-34 (AMP): “When a stranger resides with you in your land, you shall not oppress or mistreat him. But the stranger who resides with you shall be to you like someone native-born among you, and you shall love him as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt; I am the Lord your God.”

God’s command is clear: foreigners are to be treated with dignity, not as second-class citizens. However, this does not mean that lawlessness is excused. Numbers 15:16 (AMP) establishes this principle: “There is to be one law and one ordinance for you and for the stranger who resides with you.” This means that while compassion is non-negotiable, so is accountability. Foreigners living among us are expected to follow the same rules as those born in the land.

In a striking moment of contemporary history, a female pastor confronted then-President Trump during a church service over his policies regarding deportation. She pleaded for a more compassionate approach, advocating for those who sought refuge and opportunity. Her words echoed biblical teachings, where mercy is repeatedly emphasized. At the same time, his administration’s actions reflected the principle of upholding the law.

Jesus Himself addressed the balance between earthly authority and divine responsibility in Matthew 22:21 (AMP): “Then He said to them, ‘Then pay to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s; and to God the things that are God’s.’” This response was not about blind submission to government but a recognition that governance has its place, and so does the higher call to love and justice.

Applying this to modern immigration debates, the challenge lies in harmonizing these principles. Governments must enforce laws to maintain order, but believers are called to treat all people—including foreigners—with the same compassion God commanded. This means advocating for fair treatment, humane solutions, and ensuring that no policy contradicts the higher moral law given by God.

The early church embodied this balance. Paul, writing to the Galatians, reminded them in Galatians 3:28 (AMP): “There is [now no distinction in regard to salvation] neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you [who believe] are all one in Christ Jesus.” This does not mean nations should dissolve their borders but rather that no person should be treated with less dignity because of where they were born.

If we are to follow Christ’s example, our response to the alien among us must go beyond politics. It must reflect the heart of God—justice that upholds laws and mercy that recognizes the humanity in all people. We cannot afford to let political divisions rob us of our divine calling to love our neighbor, whether they were born next door or in another land. If we seek His wisdom, we may yet find the path that honors both Caesar and God.


Justice and Mercy: The Reality of Law and Consequences

When then-President Donald Trump attended a church service at Bethel Christian Center in Detroit, he was confronted by Pastor Faith Green Timmons, an African Methodist Episcopal (AME) minister. As he began to discuss political matters, she interrupted him, stating, “Mr. Trump, we invited you here to talk to us, not to give a political speech.” This moment, captured and widely shared, sparked both praise and outrage. To some, she was a voice of courage, standing for compassion and justice. To others, she disrespected the office of the president. Regardless of personal views, this exchange highlighted a deeper issue—how do we reconcile the rule of law with the call to mercy?

Scripture is clear that God ordains governing authorities. Romans 13:1-2 (AMP) states: “Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God [granted by His permission and sanction], and those which exist have been put in place by God. Therefore, whoever resists [governmental authority] resists the ordinance of God, and those who have resisted it will bring judgment (civil penalty) on themselves.” This does not mean blind allegiance, but it does mean respecting the structure of law and governance.

The reality is that many individuals enter the United States illegally, some in search of opportunity, others with criminal intent. But being here unlawfully, while a civil infraction, does not exempt anyone from the law. There are legal and illegal residents alike who commit crimes—drug trafficking, violent offenses, human trafficking—and must be held accountable. Exodus 23:1-2 (AMP) warns: “You shall not give a false report; do not join your hand with a wicked man to be a malicious witness [promoting wrong and violence]. You shall not follow a crowd to do evil.” This principle applies to governance as well: laws must be upheld, not bent to the will of public sentiment.

Many argue that deportation policies are too harsh, but a look at global standards puts this into perspective. There are nations where unauthorized entry results in severe consequences—immediate imprisonment, forced labor, or even execution. In some countries, border crossers are shot on sight, their bodies left as warnings to others. By comparison, U.S. policies—while controversial—are significantly more lenient.

We are now reaping what has been sown under previous administrations—decades of inconsistent enforcement, political posturing, and shifting immigration policies. While Trump's rhetoric is undoubtedly strong, his actions reflect a broader reality: laws exist for a reason, and a nation cannot function without enforcing them. Proverbs 29:4 (AMP) reminds us: “The king establishes the land by justice, but a man who takes bribes overthrows it.” Whether one supports or opposes Trump personally, he is the president, and his office commands respect.

Soft times have created soft people. Generations past—immigrants and citizens alike—built their lives through backbreaking labor, self-reliance, and determination. There was no expectation of handouts, no safety net beyond community and faith. The solution today is the same as it was then: put on our work boots, roll up our sleeves, and get to work. Those who come to this country legally, seeking opportunity, should do so with the understanding that success comes through effort, not entitlement.

The balance between justice and mercy is not found in ignoring the law, nor in blind enforcement. It is found in accountability, in respecting authority, and in ensuring that those who choose to break the law—regardless of their origin—face consequences. Jesus did not call for lawlessness; He called for righteousness. If we are to move forward as a nation, we must do the same.

Earning Citizenship Through Service: A Biblical and Practical Solution

The debate over immigration often centers around two extremes—either unconditional acceptance or strict removal. But what about those who are already here, seeking nothing more than an opportunity for a better life, yet lack a legal pathway to citizenship? What if, instead of viewing them as an ongoing problem, we gave them a way to earn their place through service?

Scripture provides a foundation for this approach. Leviticus 19:33-34 (AMP) states: “When a stranger resides with you in your land, you shall not oppress or mistreat him. But the stranger who resides with you shall be to you as the native-born among you, and you shall love him as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt; I am the Lord your God.” This passage highlights the importance of treating foreigners with dignity, but it does not advocate for lawlessness. Rather, it suggests integration and responsibility.

One solution that aligns with both scripture and historical precedent is mandatory military service for non-criminal immigrants seeking citizenship. The idea is simple: those who are already here, have no criminal history, and genuinely want to contribute should be given the opportunity to serve. Not in high-security positions where classified information is at risk, but in essential support roles—kitchen duty, logistics, medical training, infrastructure maintenance—where they can prove their commitment to this nation.

Historically, military service has been a means of earning citizenship. The Roman Empire often granted full citizenship to non-Roman soldiers who completed their service. The U.S. has followed similar principles in the past, granting legal status to immigrants who served honorably in the armed forces. This model ensures that those willing to sacrifice for the country gain not only citizenship but a vested interest in its success.

Jesus' parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25-37) further reinforces this idea. A man, beaten and left for dead, was ignored by his own people but rescued by a Samaritan—someone considered an outsider. The lesson? Compassion is shown through action. Instead of endless debate over what to do with undocumented immigrants who mean no harm, why not give them a tangible way to contribute? A structured, disciplined system that allows them to earn their place rather than take it for granted.

Mandatory service wouldn’t be a free pass; it would be a proving ground. After completing their tour of duty, they would take the same citizenship exam as anyone else applying legally. If they pass, they have truly earned their place, not through loopholes or favoritism, but through effort and dedication.

There is wisdom in both justice and mercy. If someone is willing to serve this nation, work hard, and abide by its laws, should they not be given the opportunity to become a citizen? Proverbs 14:23 (AMP) says, “In all labor there is profit, but mere talk leads only to poverty.” Talk alone will not fix this issue. It’s time to take action.

A system like this would ensure that only those truly committed to the values of this nation gain citizenship, while also reinforcing the idea that privilege is earned, not simply given. Let the able-bodied work, let the willing serve, and let the truly dedicated stand among us as equals.

Search

Google Searches Of Popular & Related Topics

The Lessons of the Revolution: Why George Washington Would Be Rolling in His Grave

The American Revolution was not merely a war for independence—it was a fight against tyranny, against a government that imposed its will upon the people without their consent. The colonists rebelled not only because of taxation without representation but also due to restrictions on personal freedoms, religious oppression, and economic exploitation by the British Crown.

George Washington, long before becoming the first President of the United States, understood what was at stake. He led an army of farmers, merchants, and everyday people against one of the most powerful empires in the world—not because they desired war, but because they had no other choice. The lessons from that war still hold relevance today, reminding us that when a government places its own power above the rights of the people, it is the duty of those people to resist.

One of the most crucial victories of the Revolution was the establishment of a government free from religious tyranny. Unlike the monarchies of Europe, where kings and queens ruled by “divine right,” the newly formed United States declared that religion and government must remain separate. The First Amendment of the Constitution enshrined this principle, ensuring that no single faith could dominate the political landscape or dictate the laws of the land.

Yet, in recent times, we have witnessed actions that would have deeply troubled Washington and his fellow revolutionaries. In a speech widely broadcast by news media and YouTube, former President Donald Trump openly endorsed the Evangelical Christian faith movement in a way that many have argued violates the very principles upon which this nation was founded. Such blatant favoritism toward one religious group over others stands in direct contradiction to the values of a free and diverse society.

The issue here is not about the personal faith of a leader—any President is entitled to their own beliefs. The issue is when those beliefs influence government policy in a way that undermines religious freedom. If our leaders use their power to elevate one faith above others, are we not heading down the same path our forefathers fought to escape?

Washington himself, in his farewell address, warned against the dangers of factionalism and the mingling of church and state. He understood that a government beholden to any single religious ideology would inevitably oppress those who did not conform. It is a lesson written in blood on the pages of history—when religious power and political power intertwine, tyranny often follows.

If George Washington could see what is happening today, would he not be dismayed? Would he not remind us of the sacrifices made to secure our freedoms? The Revolution was not fought so that one group could dominate the others; it was fought so that all could live freely, without fear of persecution, without a government imposing its will upon their faith, or their lack thereof.

To preserve the ideals of the Revolution, we must remain vigilant. We must remember that freedom is not just about personal liberty—it is about ensuring that no government, no leader, and no movement can claim ownership over the rights of the people. If we forget this, we risk losing everything our ancestors fought to achieve.


The Path to Totalitarianism: Are We Repeating the Mistakes of History?

Throughout history, totalitarian regimes have risen not in an instant, but through a series of carefully crafted policies, speeches, and public persuasion that normalized control over personal belief systems. The erosion of freedom does not always begin with force—it often begins with words, subtly steering the masses toward ideological conformity.

Adolf Hitler, Vladimir Lenin, and Josef Stalin each took advantage of their nation's social unrest and economic hardship to impose their will on the people. Hitler’s rise to power was not solely based on brute force; it was cultivated through propaganda, nationalistic rhetoric, and the slow chipping away of opposition. His speeches demonized those who did not conform, painting them as enemies of the state. Lenin and Stalin, in turn, took control by dictating not only political beliefs but also personal ideologies, erasing religious institutions that opposed their rule and enforcing a rigid, state-sanctioned philosophy.

In the United States, we have long prided ourselves on freedom of religion and thought. But if we examine the speeches of our leaders since the Reagan administration, a pattern emerges—one that should concern us all.

George H.W. Bush spoke of a “new world order,” a vision of international unity that, while seemingly harmless, hinted at a shift toward centralized global governance. Bill Clinton introduced policies that favored state intervention in areas previously left to individual conscience. George W. Bush, in the wake of 9/11, expanded government surveillance and laid the foundation for a security state where privacy became secondary to national security. Barack Obama, while speaking of hope and unity, also advanced policies that subtly pressured religious institutions to conform to state mandates, placing ideology above doctrine.

And now, under Donald Trump, we see the culmination of decades of political conditioning. His speeches embolden a faction that seeks to merge faith with governance, disregarding the constitutional principle of separating church and state. The rhetoric of “us vs. them” echoes that of leaders from history who used division as a tool of control. When a government begins dictating what beliefs are acceptable, it paves the way for suppression of dissent, just as Hitler declared certain philosophies "un-German," Lenin deemed religious beliefs counterrevolutionary, and Stalin used brute force to eradicate ideological opposition.

The question we must ask ourselves is: How much further must we go before the government—under any administration—demands total obedience to a singular worldview? The warning signs are there: a growing intolerance for differing opinions, the branding of dissenters as traitors, and the increasing use of political power to enforce ideological uniformity.

America was founded on the principle that people have the right to think, believe, and worship (or not worship) as they choose. But history has shown us that the road to totalitarianism is paved with slow, almost imperceptible steps toward conformity. If we do not remain vigilant, if we allow ourselves to become comfortable with leaders who demand ideological loyalty, we may find ourselves living under a government where independent thought is not only discouraged—it is punished.

The downfall of every totalitarian regime was inevitable because people, at their core, yearn for freedom. But the cost of reclaiming that freedom has always been immense. We must ask ourselves: Will we recognize the warning signs and act before it is too late, or will we repeat the mistakes of history and be forced to fight for our liberty once more?


Disclaimer:
...

Our Unorthodox Life & Required Disclaimer


Disclaimer & Invitation:

This blog contains discussions on adult-oriented topics, including the responsible use of psychedelics, erotic expression, and spiritual practices that may challenge conventional beliefs. By continuing to engage with this content, you acknowledge that you are of legal age in your jurisdiction and that your participation is voluntary.

We, as ministers of an unorthodox spiritual path, do not claim moral authority over anyone, nor do we seek to impose our beliefs. Our perspectives are rooted in historical and cultural traditions—drawing from pre-Christian European paganism, Native American spirituality (including Algonquin and Cherokee beliefs), and other ancestral practices that honor personal freedom, balance, and self-discovery.

Regarding psychedelics, we emphasize responsible, intentional use within legal boundaries. We do not promote illegal activity, nor do we provide, sell, or distribute any substances. Each individual is responsible for their own choices and compliance with local laws.

Similarly, discussions of erotic expression—whether in art, lifestyle, or philosophy—are meant to foster appreciation for human sensuality, not exploitation. The celebration of the feminine form, personal expression through provocative fashion, and engagement in open dialogue are part of our worldview. However, participation in this conversation requires mutual respect and understanding.

By engaging with this blog and our community, you accept full responsibility for how you interpret and apply the content. We reserve the right to limit interactions if boundaries are not respected or if discussions veer into harmful, unlawful, or exploitative behavior.

That said, if you are here to explore ideas with an open mind, to engage in meaningful conversation, and to question the limitations imposed by mainstream thought, then we welcome you. Feel free to reach out, challenge perspectives, and join us in forging a path that honors freedom, respect, and self-discovery.

Blog Posts